Memory Integration

Recognising dangerous situations is crucial for regulating defensive behaviours that are tailored to the imminence of potential harm. Past life-threatening situations that have been overcome teach us about what might pose a risk of harm in the future. However, when learned or similar threats are not immediately perceptible in the current environment, the risk of harm, even if remote, may still exist. In such cases, it must be inferred rather than directly derived from a past aversive experience. How do individuals assess risk in such circumstances?

Past aversive experiences teach us what may pose a threat to our well-being. However, detecting threats often entails exposure to potentially harmful situations – risks that could be minimized if individuals could predict encountering threats ahead of time. How do individuals come to identify signals that indicate the risk of harm before the threat is actually present?

My theoretical paper outlining the research framework of how individuals protect themselves from danger despite minimal aversive experience using mnemonic processes.

Imagine you frequently walk past a particular house with a fenced yard and a barking dog inside. You hardly pay attention to the house or the fence—they’re just part of your daily routine. One day, however, you surprisingly encounter the aggressive dog on a street nearby, and barking furiously it attacks you. Next time, would you walk past your standard route by the fence again? If not, at what point would you decide to change your route?